The Shoulder
The Shoulder
52
Car accidentssharp-bison-393

Witnessed a nasty intersection crash tonight — who's actually at fault when both were gunning it?

So I was sitting at a red light maybe two car lengths back when this whole thing unfolded right in front of me. A sedan was trying to squeeze through a left turn on a stale yellow, and at the same time a pickup in the oncoming lane was clearly accelerating — not slowing down — trying to beat the same light. They absolutely destroyed each other in the middle of the intersection.

Everybody involved got out on their own two feet which, honestly, given how hard the hit was, felt like a miracle. One of the front ends was basically folded in half.

I always thought left-turn drivers carry the blame automatically because they're the ones cutting across traffic. I had a situation a couple years ago where I turned left and got clipped, and yeah — the report went against me even though I thought the other guy was flying.

But watching this tonight I genuinely couldn't tell you who was more reckless. The turning driver misjudged the gap for sure, but the oncoming driver had to have been well over the speed limit to arrive that fast. Like, if he was going the posted limit he might have cleared the intersection after the turn was complete, right?

Does speeding by the through-traffic driver actually shift any blame onto them? Or is it still automatically 100% on the turning driver no matter what? I gave my info to one of the people involved as a witness and I want to understand what I might be asked about if this goes anywhere legally.

10replies

Not sure what your claim is worth?

AskMatlock can connect you with an independent injury lawyer for a free case check — no pressure, no cost to start.

Check my case

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle

10 replies

  • 20
    sharp-beaver-164

    I was in almost this exact situation as the turning driver a while back. My insurance initially put 100% on me, but my attorney pushed back because the other driver's speed was documented by traffic cam footage. It ended up being split fault in the end. Definitely not automatic anymore once speeding is in the picture.

    • 11
      cool-heron-115

      Both drivers made bad decisions, full stop. But legally 'both were dumb' doesn't split evenly on its own — someone has to prove the other's speed. If you're willing to be a witness, your account could genuinely change the outcome for one of those people. Take that seriously.

    • 2
      level-mile-marker252

      Thank you both, this gave me the push I needed to make the call.

  • 6
    keen-tern-033

    Not legal advice, but — contributory vs. comparative negligence is exactly the right question here. In most states, if the through-traffic driver was speeding, that can absolutely factor into shared fault. The left-turn presumption isn't iron-clad when the other party's negligence contributed to the conditions. As a witness your observations about the pickup's speed could actually matter a lot.

    • 9
      keen-fox-305

      I used to work claims and I'll tell you — adjusters love the left-turn default because it closes files fast. But if there's a witness (like you) who can speak to the other driver's speed, and especially if there's any physical evidence like skid marks or point-of-impact data, the split-fault argument gets real traction. Don't be surprised if one of the parties' attorneys reaches out to you. Keep your account consistent and honest.

  • 14
    brave-stoat-474

    Whatever you do, if an insurance adjuster calls you as a witness, be careful about how they frame their questions. They have a way of getting you to say things that sound more definitive than you actually mean. Stick to what you literally saw, not interpretations.

    • 8
      cool-stoat-865

      As a witness you could be asked to give a recorded statement or even a deposition if this turns into litigation. Jot down everything you remember right now while it's fresh — time of day, lighting, approximately how fast you estimated the pickup was moving, whether you heard brakes at all before impact. That kind of detail is surprisingly useful later and your memory will fade faster than you think.

  • 12
    candid-beaver-374

    Glad everyone walked away. Just a heads-up for the people involved — adrenaline masks a lot right after a crash. Neck and back injuries especially don't always show up until 24-48 hours later. Hopefully they all got checked out and didn't just wave off the paramedics.

  • 19
    genuine-bison-944

    How confident are you really in the speed estimate on that pickup? Like, were you watching it from far enough back to get a sense of its pace, or is it more of a gut feeling? I'm not doubting you, just thinking about how that holds up if you're ever asked under oath.

    • 2
      grounded-road-soul387

      Did the timeline change anything for you? Mine dragged on for weeks.