The Shoulder
The Shoulder
52
Car accidentspatient-elk-242

UIM coverage — can I actually use it if I don't have collision? Getting contradictory answers

So I got rear-ended a few weeks ago by someone who clearly wasn't paying attention. Thankfully nothing catastrophic, but my bumper and trunk area took a hit and there's some hidden damage the shop flagged when they got under it. The other driver is at fault — no dispute there — but their liability coverage is pretty thin.

Here's my situation: between the repair estimate, a rental for however long this takes, and replacing two child safety seats that were in the car at the time (which you're apparently supposed to do after any crash, even if they look fine), I'm creeping close to the at-fault driver's property damage limit. Maybe over, depending on what else the shop finds.

So I called my own insurer to ask about using my underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage to fill the gap. First rep said I couldn't use it because I don't carry collision or comprehensive — just liability and UIM. Second rep said the opposite. My agent kind of shrugged and said UIM is basically a legal requirement in my state but "rarely applies" to situations like this.

Now I have three different answers and zero clarity.

I guess my real questions are: 1. What is UIM property damage coverage even for if you can't use it in a situation like this? 2. Has anyone successfully made a UIM claim without having collision on their policy? 3. Is opening a claim through my own insurer going to mess with my rates even if the other driver is 100% at fault?

I feel like I'm going in circles. Any help appreciated.

11replies

Not sure what your claim is worth?

AskMatlock can connect you with an independent injury lawyer for a free case check — no pressure, no cost to start.

Check my case

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle

11 replies

  • 21
    genuine-crow-287

    I went through almost this exact same runaround last year. Different state, different insurer, same maddening experience of getting a different answer every time I called. What finally worked for me was asking to speak with a claims supervisor specifically — not just a general rep — and having them walk me through the actual policy language on the call. The front-line people sometimes genuinely don't know the nuances. Persistence matters here.

  • 18
    curious-vole-258

    UIM coverage actually comes in two flavors depending on the state: bodily injury UIM and property damage UIM (sometimes called UMPD). They work differently and not every state requires both. The confusion you're getting from reps might be because they're conflating the two. Pull your actual declarations page and look for exactly what your UIM coverage is labeled as — that'll tell you more than any phone rep. Also worth noting: some states have a threshold where UMPD only kicks in if the at-fault driver has zero coverage, not just low limits. That could be why your agent said it 'rarely applies.'

    • 0
      soft-spoken-mile-marker272

      This thread is gold. Thanks everyone.

  • 9
    clever-newt-171

    The fact that you got two opposite answers from the same company tells you everything. They'll say whatever gets you off the phone. Get everything in writing — if a rep tells you that you can use the coverage, ask them to follow up with an email confirming it. Verbal promises from insurance phone reps are worth nothing when it comes to actually paying a claim.

  • 11
    humble-fox-729

    Honestly, from the inside, this kind of inconsistency happens because UIM property damage is genuinely one of the more complicated and state-specific coverages, and a lot of call center reps aren't trained deeply on it. They're reading from scripts. Your best move is to file a written inquiry — email or certified letter — asking your insurer to explain in writing whether your policy covers UIM property damage claims when the at-fault driver has some but insufficient liability coverage. That creates a paper trail and forces someone with actual authority to respond.

  • 16
    patient-otter-436

    Don't sleep on the car seat replacement piece — I just want to make sure you're aware that most manufacturers actually void the warranty after any collision, even a minor one you can't see damage from. Some insurers will cover replacement under property damage claims but you have to specifically ask and document it. Keep receipts for whatever seats you buy.

    • 7
      weary-driver748

      Going through something similar right now. Did following up actually move the needle for you?

  • 18
    clever-hare-623

    Not legal advice, but the interaction between UIM property damage coverage and collision coverage varies significantly by state statute, and your insurer's own policy language may add more conditions on top of that. If you're getting contradictory answers, it might be worth a free consult with a PI attorney just to get clarity on what your state's UIM laws actually require — not to sue anyone, just to understand what you're entitled to. Many will answer a question like this in 15 minutes at no charge.

  • 10
    spry-owl-166

    Stop calling and start emailing. Every time you call you're starting from zero with a new person who may or may not know what they're talking about. Send a concise email to your insurer laying out exactly what happened, exactly what coverage you have, and asking point-blank: does my policy cover this gap? Now you have a timestamp and a response you can hold them to.

    • 5
      patient-wanderer920

      This is exactly what I needed to read today. Thank you.

  • 7
    brave-seal-002

    Quick question — when you say you're 'creeping close' to their liability limit, do you have actual written estimates, or are you still going off ballpark numbers from the shop? I ask because there's a big difference between 'this might go over' and 'we have documented costs that exceed the at-fault policy.' The UIM question matters more once you have real numbers in hand.