The Shoulder
The Shoulder
62
Car accidentsswift-newt-935

Still blaming myself for a rear-end crash years later — did I actually do something wrong?

This has been eating at me for a while and I finally want to hear what other people think.

A few years back I was driving on a two-lane road, going a few mph under the posted limit, when the SUV directly ahead of me just stopped dead — not slowed down, stopped. No construction, no animal, no light. I stood on the brakes immediately and I could feel something was off — the pedal felt weird, kind of pulsing in a way I wasn't expecting. I still couldn't stop in time and hit them.

The responding officer noted my skid marks in the report and estimated I'd scrubbed off a significant amount of speed before impact, but insurance still dinged me as at-fault because... rear-end, I guess. That was that.

Here's what's haunted me: a few days after the crash, a mechanic friend looked at my car and mentioned my braking system might not have been performing right. I never pursued it because honestly I was just relieved nobody was seriously hurt and I wanted to move on.

But lately I keep replaying it. Was there something wrong with the car that contributed? Could the other driver's sudden stop have been a factor at all? I know it's been years so there's probably nothing actionable here, but I guess I just want to understand whether I was actually negligent or whether something else was going on.

Has anyone dealt with a situation where a mechanical issue might have played into a crash you got blamed for? How did you make peace with it — or did you look into it further?

11replies

Not sure what your claim is worth?

AskMatlock can connect you with an independent injury lawyer for a free case check — no pressure, no cost to start.

Check my case

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle

11 replies

  • 20
    plain-owl-026

    The emotional weight of this kind of thing is so real and people don't talk about it enough. Survivor's guilt, self-blame after accidents — it can linger for years and affect your stress levels, sleep, all of it. Whether or not there's a legal angle here, please don't discount what carrying this around has cost you mentally. Talking to someone (even just a counselor) about accident trauma is worth it even long after the physical stuff is resolved.

    • 2
      patient-driver127

      This is exactly what I needed to read today. Thank you.

  • 19
    sharp-beaver-662

    The fact that you're still thinking about this after all this time tells me you're a conscientious person, not a reckless one. Reckless people don't lose sleep over whether they could've done something differently. I hope you find some peace with this either way. 💙

  • 18
    daring-hare-422

    Insurance companies love the rear-end rule because it lets them close cases fast. The second you accepted that at-fault label without a fight, they won. I'm not saying you had a winnable case — maybe you did, maybe you didn't — but the pulsing pedal thing you described sounds like it could've been an ABS malfunction or low brake fluid, and that's a detail that deserved serious attention. Don't let them make you feel like their snap judgment was gospel.

  • 17
    bright-tern-552

    Honestly? The time to fight this was right after it happened, and that ship has probably sailed for any kind of claim. But that's separate from the question of whether you were actually at fault in a moral sense. Sounds like your brakes weren't right and the other driver stopped without warning. Both of those things can be true simultaneously. You're not a bad driver. Let yourself off the hook.

    • 7
      kind-neighbor409

      Wish I had seen this a month ago — would have saved me a lot of stress.

    • 7
      grounded-mile-marker292

      Exactly my experience. Persistence paid off in the end.

  • 14
    keen-hare-782

    Oh man, I felt this in my chest. I got rear-ended into another car once and somehow ended up sharing fault. The insurance logic made zero sense to me. I spent probably two years second-guessing every decision I made in those two seconds before impact. What helped me was writing out a timeline of exactly what happened — not for legal reasons, just for my own head. Sometimes you realize you did everything a reasonable person could do.

    • 10
      quick-tern-145

      Not legal advice, but I'll say this much: brake system issues contributing to a collision is something that can shift or complicate the fault picture, especially if there's documentation — a repair record, a mechanic's statement, anything. The problem with time passing is evidence disappears. At this point it's probably more about closure than a claim, but if you still have any paperwork from that mechanic friend's assessment, hang onto it. Might be worth a free consult somewhere just to understand what your options ever were.

  • 8
    curious-marmot-912

    I'll be real with you — from the inside, rear-end collisions almost always get coded at-fault against the following driver because it's the path of least resistance. Adjusters aren't investigators. If nobody pushed back immediately with evidence of a mechanical defect or the lead driver's erratic behavior, the file just closes that way. It doesn't mean you were actually negligent. It means nobody dug deeper. That happens constantly and it's genuinely unfair.

  • 5
    patient-marten-811

    I don't want to pile on, but I'm curious — did the mechanic friend ever put anything in writing, or was it just a verbal 'something seems off'? And do you know if the driver ahead of you ever gave a reason for stopping? Those two details change the picture a lot. Without them it's hard to say how much the brake issue actually contributed versus just being a coincidence.