The Shoulder
The Shoulder
61
Insurancemellow-kestrel-202

Insurance saying my steering shimmy is 'pre-existing wear' — after a crash that hit my front wheel directly??

I'm so frustrated right now I don't even know where to start.

About two months ago someone ran a red light and clipped the front passenger corner of my car pretty hard. They were 100% at fault — police report, witness, the whole thing. Their insurance accepted liability right away, no argument there.

My car spent almost six weeks at the body shop getting the front end repaired. I picked it up, drove it around town, seemed fine. Then I got on the highway for the first time and around 65–70 mph the steering wheel starts shaking like crazy. Not a little shimmy — like I'm gripping a paint mixer. Never happened before the crash. I drove that highway route every single week before this.

I brought it back, their insurance sent out an adjuster with a mechanic, and the mechanic found that one of my front CV axles is bent. Cool, that explains the vibration. But now the adjuster is claiming the bent axle is just normal wear and tear and they're denying that part of the repair.

Wear. And. Tear.

The wheel that got hit was directly in the impact zone. I've done basic research and everything points to bent axles coming from sudden force — collisions, hard curb strikes, bad potholes — not gradual everyday driving. My car isn't even that old.

They're basically telling me I need to get a specialist mechanic to write up a formal statement specifically linking the crash geometry to the axle damage. That feels like an insane burden to put on me when the logic is pretty obvious.

Has anyone fought back against a denial like this? Did you get an independent mechanic opinion? Did it actually help? I feel like I'm being gaslit by an insurance company that already accepted fault for everything else.

14replies

Not sure what your claim is worth?

AskMatlock can connect you with an independent injury lawyer for a free case check — no pressure, no cost to start.

Check my case

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle

14 replies

  • 22
    wise-beaver-945

    This is almost exactly what happened to me after a front-end collision a couple years back. Insurance tried the same 'pre-existing condition' angle on some suspension damage. I paid out of pocket for an independent alignment and inspection shop to put it in writing that the damage pattern was consistent with impact, not gradual wear. Took about two weeks but the insurance company backed down pretty fast after that. Worth every penny of the inspection fee.

    • 14
      careful-hare-439

      I used to work on the claims side and I'll be honest with you — 'wear and tear' is one of the most overused exclusion reasons I saw applied, especially on suspension and drivetrain components that aren't visually obvious in initial damage photos. The adjuster may not have even seen the vehicle personally; they're often just going off what the mechanic wrote in a one-page report. An independent inspection from a shop that specializes in collision diagnostics carries real weight as a counter-document. Get it in writing and send it via email so there's a paper trail.

    • 6
      gentle-neighbor971

      Seconding this. The same approach worked for me last year.

  • 15
    mellow-dove-088

    They accepted liability, which means they've already admitted their insured caused the crash. Now they're trying to carve out individual components to avoid paying. This is a classic tactic — deny the parts that require the most expensive labor and hope you either give up or can't prove causation. Don't let them reframe the burden of proof onto you so easily.

  • 19
    candid-swan-573

    A few practical steps that tend to move the needle in situations like this:

    1. Request the full written denial in writing if you don't already have it — you want the exact language they're using. 2. Get an independent mechanic (ideally one familiar with collision repair, not just routine maintenance) to inspect it and write an opinion letter stating whether the damage is consistent with impact force. 3. File a complaint with your state's Department of Insurance if they're stonewalling. Insurers really don't like DOI complaints — it triggers oversight.

    Not legal advice, just process stuff I've seen work.

    • 10
      tired-driver532

      Going through something similar right now. Did following up actually move the needle for you?

  • 11
    patient-swift-071

    The core issue here is causation — they accepted liability for the crash but they're disputing whether this specific damage was caused by the crash. An independent expert opinion directly addressing that link is genuinely useful, not just a hoop. If the denial stands and the repair cost is significant, a PI attorney can often send a demand letter that prompts a second look without you ever filing suit. Most offer free consultations. Not legal advice, just context.

  • 16
    gentle-dove-050

    Please don't keep driving it at highway speeds while this is unresolved. I know that sounds obvious but a bent axle that's causing that level of vibration can fail in ways that affect your steering control. Sort the insurance fight out, but borrow a car or avoid the highway in the meantime. Your safety comes before the claim timeline.

    • 4
      restless-offramp711

      Exactly my experience. Persistence paid off in the end.

  • 20
    mellow-swift-648

    Genuine question — did the body shop do a four-wheel alignment when they finished the repairs? Because sometimes shops focus on the visible body damage and miss underlying suspension geometry issues. If there's any chance the body shop released it without a full alignment check, the insurance company might try to argue the shop should be responsible. Worth knowing before you go back to the insurer.

    • 2
      tired-survivor665

      Wish I had seen this a month ago — would have saved me a lot of stress.

  • 6
    bright-otter-518

    Get a second mechanic opinion, get it in writing, send it to the adjuster and CC their supervisor. If they still deny it, escalate to your state insurance commissioner — the complaint process is free and usually online. Don't spend six months going in circles with the same adjuster.

  • 9
    warm-seal-911

    The fact that they accepted liability already is actually a big deal in your favor. You're not fighting about fault — you're just fighting about one repair line item. That's a much narrower battle than a lot of people are dealing with. An independent inspection to close that gap sounds annoying but it's probably a faster resolution than you'd expect once you have the documentation.

    • 6
      honest-passenger662

      Wish I had seen this a month ago — would have saved me a lot of stress.