The Shoulder
The Shoulder
50
Insuranceplain-kestrel-940

Insurance company is basically calling me a liar after a deer strike — what do I do?

I'm so frustrated right now I don't even know where to start.

A few weeks ago I was driving home on a rural highway and a deer bolted out of the tree line. I swerved and hit the brakes but the thing clipped my front passenger side pretty hard — cracked the bumper cover, bent the hood, and messed up a headlight assembly. No other cars around, no witnesses, just me and a very unlucky deer.

I filed a claim with my insurance the same day. Here's where it gets wild:

  • They didn't actually respond with anything meaningful for almost two weeks. Just an automated message telling me something totally irrelevant about storage facilities???
  • Now they're pulling some data from my car and claiming their system shows a "prior impact event" from before I filed. There WAS no prior event. The car was fine.
  • They're demanding I produce photos of my car before the accident. Who just randomly takes pictures of their car??
  • They want written verification from my employer proving I was actually driving when I said I was. I gave them my timesheet but apparently that's not enough.
  • I've already done two recorded interviews. The second one felt like an interrogation — way more aggressive than the first.

I feel like they're building a case to deny me rather than actually investigating fairly. Has anyone else gone through something like this? Do I need a lawyer at this point or is there still a way to push back on my own? I don't want to make it "a whole thing" but I also can't just eat the repair cost on a car I'm still paying off.

11replies

Not sure what your claim is worth?

AskMatlock can connect you with an independent injury lawyer for a free case check — no pressure, no cost to start.

Check my case

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle

11 replies

  • 23
    plain-owl-833

    I used to work claims and I'll be straight with you — what you're describing is a soft deny strategy. They pile on documentation requests hoping you'll either give up, miss a deadline, or say something inconsistent. The telematics argument is sometimes legitimate but just as often it's a stretch. The storage facility message sounds like someone copy-pasted the wrong template onto your file, which tells you how much attention they're actually paying. Keep a written log of every contact, every request, every date. That paper trail matters a lot if this escalates.

  • 22
    patient-fox-351

    A couple of things worth knowing: most states have fair claims handling regulations that require insurers to respond and resolve claims within specific timeframes — a two-week silence followed by this much pushback could actually be a violation worth noting. Also, you can file a complaint with your state's Department of Insurance. You don't need a lawyer to do that, and sometimes just the existence of a complaint changes how quickly an insurer moves. It won't solve everything but it puts you on record.

    • 5
      gentle-dreamer327

      Wish I had seen this a month ago — would have saved me a lot of stress.

  • 20
    genuine-elk-621

    Two recorded interviews with a 'higher up' the second time around? That's a classic escalation tactic. They're fishing for inconsistencies in your story, not actually trying to help you. Be really careful what you say going forward — every word gets logged. Honestly I'd stop talking to them without some kind of guidance at this point.

  • 15
    kind-crane-772

    The 'prior impact' thing happened to me too — my insurer tried to use telematics data to imply I'd already been in an accident before I filed. Turned out the system had flagged a really hard pothole hit from weeks earlier. I had to get a written statement from a mechanic confirming the damage was consistent with a single fresh impact. That alone basically killed their argument. Definitely push back on the data — it's not as airtight as they want you to think.

  • 13
    daring-beaver-528

    Not legal advice, but — two recorded statements, requests for pre-accident photos, employer verification, AND a telematics data argument all at once? That's a lot of pressure for what should be a straightforward comprehensive claim. If they deny you or lowball you, you likely have grounds to push back hard. Worth at least a free consultation with a PI or bad faith insurance attorney before you accept anything or give them more statements.

  • 8
    silent-lynx-894

    I know this feels like a wall right now but the fact that you kept your timesheet and submitted it quickly actually puts you in a decent position. A lot of people don't document anything. You have a starting point. The mechanic statement tip above is gold — get someone to put in writing that the damage pattern matches a single-event deer strike and that there's no evidence of older underlying damage. That kind of thing can flip the narrative fast.

    • 10
      honest-survivor916

      This is exactly what I needed to read today. Thank you.

  • 5
    mellow-crow-500

    Are you doing okay physically? Sometimes with sudden swerving and hard braking people brush off soreness or stiffness because the car took the visible hit, not them. Whiplash and soft tissue stuff can sneak up on you days later. If anything feels off, please see someone — and document it, because it matters more than people realize if this turns into a bigger dispute.

  • 5
    spry-grouse-097

    Stop doing interviews without knowing your rights first. You've already given them two bites at the apple. If they schedule a third, it's okay to say you'd like some time to review what's already been submitted before you respond further. You're not obligated to keep answering the same questions until they get the answer they're looking for.

    • 3
      kind-dreamer246

      Thanks for sharing. Hope things are getting a little easier for you.